Kautilya: Theory of State

by

Kautilya: Theory of State

Rediscovery and Context

The study of Indian political thought during the British Raj was initially shaped by several streams:

  • Orientalist-Indological: This stream pioneered the discovery of texts and presented Eastern/Indian traditions as distinctly different from Western ones.
  • Nationalist: This approach, seen in works like K. P. Jayaswal’s Hindu Polity, aimed to highlight ancient Indian political ideas and institutions, arguing that ancient India had democratic ideas.
  • Idealist-Philosophical: This stream focused on metaphysical concepts, such as Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan’s restatement of the advait (non-dualist metaphysics of Shankara).
  • A common assumption among early scholars was that Indian philosophy was primarily religious, spiritual, and society-centered, rather than concerned with political life or epistemology. However, later scholarship established that ancient Indian thought was indeed preoccupied with theories of state and government.

The Kautilya Text (Arthashastra)

  • Attribution: The Arthashastra is attributed to Kautilya, who is also known as Chanakya and Vishnugupta. Legend holds that Kautilya was a teacher at Takshshila who helped his student Chandragupta establish the Maurya dynasty.
  • Discovery and Editions: The text was discovered by R. Shamasastry in 1904. Major subsequent editions and translations include those by R. P. Kangle and L. N. Rangarajan.
  • Dating: The dating is controversial, ranging from the Mauryan period (c. 322–298 BC) to the Gupta period (or later, c. third or fourth century AD).
  • Nature: The Arthashastra is an abstract treatise on statecraft (arthashastra tradition) and contains the most complete outline of the theory of the state.
  • Key Subjects: The text prominently covers the constituent elements of the state, major departments of government, the taxation system, armed forces, the network of spies, and the theory of rajamandala (foreign policy).

Social Structure and Economy

  • Social Structure: Society was based on the varnashrama system, comprising four varnas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras) and four stages of life.
    • Brahmins: The priestly class, enjoying special privileges, with srotriyas being particularly privileged.
    • Kshatriyas: Regarded as the “protectors of the land” and the preferred recruits for the army.
    • Shudras: Included agriculturalists, artisans, and craftsmen. They were considered Aryan and could never be taken as slaves.
    • Tribal Groups: “Unsubdued jungle tribes” lived outside the varna system, typically independently, but were expected to assist the king when called upon.
  • Economy: The economy was characterized by considerable development and employed over 120 professions.
    • Property and Ownership: The institution of private property existed alongside state ownership. State claims covered common resources (like waterworks and fisheries), residual property, and treasure troves above a certain amount.
    • State Monopolies: The state held monopolies over gold, silver, gems, liquors, and gambling.
    • Agrarian Focus: The economy was predominantly agrarian. Private cultivators paid 1/6th of their produce as land revenue. Crown lands (sita) were either cultivated directly or given to share-croppers.
    • The existence of private property and developed trade refutes Orientalist theories like the Asiatic mode of production and oriental despotism.
    • Revenue: Revenue sources included durgam (fortified towns), rashtram (countryside), and khani (mines).

Saptang Theory and Administration

  • Departure from Tradition: Kautilya broke significantly from the earlier dharmashastra tradition (which centered on social customs) by asserting that the state could make its own laws (dharmanaya), and these laws would prevail in case of conflict.
  • The Seven Organs (Saptang): The state is viewed as a corporate entity composed of seven interdependent constituents, presented in the following order:
    1. Swami (King/Ruler)
    2. Amatya (Ministers/High Officials)
    3. Janpada/Rashtra (Territory and Population)
    4. Durga (Fortified Towns/Cities)
    5. Kosa (Treasury)
    6. Danda (Forces/Army)
    7. Mitra (Allies)
  • Kautilya argues that all these elements are equally important and indispensable, although calamities affecting one element might be functionally substituted by others.
  • Bureaucracy: The Kautilyan state demonstrated a high degree of functional specialization, detailing 34 different departments headed by adhyakshas (e.g., Chief Superintendent of Treasury, Chief Salt Commissioner, Chief Textile Commissioner). The treasury’s strength (supported by mining/metallurgy) was considered essential for the state’s power and territorial expansion.
  • Centralization: The text advocates for a highly centralized system. Proponents point to the primacy of raja dharma (state law) over Brahmanical dharmashastra, state monopolies, and the huge bureaucratic apparatus. Critics, however, question the practical feasibility of centralized control over a vast territory given the lack of articulated vertical command chains.

The Theory of Rajamandala (Circle of States)

  • Purpose: This is Kautilya’s detailed theory of foreign policy and inter-state relations, formulated as a Weberian ideal type.
  • Core Principle: It is based on the maxim that a friend’s friend is likely to be a friend, and an enemy’s friend is an enemy.
  • Structure: The vijigsu (one desirous of conquest) is at the center. The immediate neighbor is typically considered an enemy (ari), and the neighbor of the enemy is usually an ally (mitra).
  • The system includes neutral (udasina) and middle (madhyama) kingdoms.
  • Six Basic Principles: The foreign policy guidelines include the pursuit of resources, elimination of enemies, cultivation of allies, prudence, preferring peace over war, and ensuring justice in victory and defeat.
  • Historical Fit: It is suggested that the rajamandala theory might reflect normative ideals of the earlier mahajanapadas period (before Magadhan supremacy) rather than the actual Mauryan Empire. The ongoing relevance of this theory is seen in its application to the frequent existence of smaller, rival kingdoms throughout Indian history.

Kautilya: Theory of State

I. Context and Rediscovery of Indian Political Thought

  • The study of Indian political thought during the British Raj was shaped by several streams, including the Orientalist-Indological, the nationalist (e.g., K. P. Jayaswal’s Hindu Polity), and the idealist-philosophical (e.g., Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan’s restatement of advait).
  • A common assumption among early scholars was that Indian thought was mainly religious, spiritual, and society-centered, and not concerned with political life, logic, or epistemology.
  • Later research, notably by Bimal Krishna Matilal, demonstrated that the assertion that Indian philosophy was only religious, spiritual, and otherworldly is questionable.

II. The Kautilya Text (Arthashastra)

  • Attribution and Legend: The Arthashastra is attributed to Kautilya, who is also known as Chanakya and Vishnugupta. Legend states Kautilya helped his student, Chandragupta, establish the Maurya dynasty.
  • Discovery and Editions: The text was discovered by R. Shamasastry in 1904, who published its first English translation in 1915. R. P. Kangle later produced a critical edition and commentary between 1960 and 1965.
  • Dating: The dating is controversial, ranging from the Mauryan period (c. 322–298 BC) to the Gupta period (or later, c. third or fourth century AD).
  • Nature: It is an abstract treatise on statecraft belonging to the arthashastra tradition.
  • Key Subjects: The text covers the constituent elements of the state, major government departments, taxation, armed forces, spies, and the theory of rajamandala (foreign policy).

III. Social Structure and Economy

  • Social Structure: Society was based on the varnashrama system, including the four varnas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras) and the four stages of life.
    • Brahmins (Priestly Class): Srotriyas enjoyed special privileges regarding laws, property ownership, and social relations.
    • Kshatriyas: They were considered the “protectors of the land” and the best recruits for the army.
  • Economy: The economy was characterized by considerable development and the existence of private property alongside state ownership.
    • The existence of private property and developed trade refutes Orientalist theories such as the Asiatic mode of production and oriental despotism.
    • State Ownership: The state claimed ownership over common resources (like waterworks), residual property, and treasure troves exceeding 100,000 panas.
    • Monopolies: State monopolies existed over gold, silver, gems, liquors, and gambling.
    • Agrarian Focus: The economy was predominantly agrarian. Private cultivators paid 1/6th of their produce as land revenue.
    • Revenue was derived from sources like durgam (fortified towns), rashtram (countryside), and khani (mines).

IV. Saptang Theory and Administration

  • Supremacy of State Law: Kautilya made a significant break from the dharmashastra tradition by asserting that the state could make its own laws (dharmanaya), which would prevail in case of conflict with social customs/laws.
  • The Seven Organs (Saptang): The state is viewed as a corporate entity with seven interdependent constituents listed in order:
    1. Swami (King/Ruler).
    2. Amatya (Ministers/High Officials).
    3. Janpada/Rashtra (Territory and Population).
    4. Durga (Fortified Towns/Cities).
    5. Kosa (Treasury).
    6. Danda (Forces/Army).
    7. Mitra (Allies).
  • Bureaucracy: The state showed a high degree of functional specialization, listing 34 different departments headed by adhyakshas (superintendents).
  • Treasury’s Importance: The financial strength of the state relies on the mining (and metallurgical) industry; the state’s power derives from its treasury (kosa), enabling territorial expansion.
  • Centralization Debate:
    • The text suggests a highly centralized system due to state monopolies, the state-focused arthashastra tradition, and the bureaucratic apparatus.
    • However, critics argue that the lack of articulated vertical command chains and detailed control suggests that centralized control over a vast area would be difficult to implement.

V. The Theory of Rajamandala (Circle of States)

  • Nature: This theory addresses foreign policy and inter-state relations, conceptualized as a Weberian ideal type.
  • Core Principle: It operates on the maxim that a friend’s friend is likely to be a friend, and an enemy’s friend is an enemy.
  • Structure: The vijigsu (one desirous of conquest) is positioned at the center. The immediate neighbor is typically considered an enemy (ari), and the neighbor of the enemy is usually an ally (mitra).
  • Goal: The motive of the conqueror is propelled by the prosperity (artha) of the ruler.
  • Six Basic Principles: Guidelines for foreign policy include the pursuit of resources, elimination of enemies, cultivation of allies, prudence, preferring peace over war, and ensuring justice in victory and defeat.
  • Relevance: The theory’s ongoing relevance is tied to the historical reality of coexisting smaller, rivaling kingdoms in India.
error: Content is protected !!